top of page
grungebkgrd_BLACK.jpg

PsyNet's Campfire Tales: What's In A Name?*



Prompt 0010: Reenact a scenario of how the Sustainable Apparel Coalition might have come to the decision to change their name after recent court rulings and poor public relations concerning the transparency of their Higgs Index. 


BEGINNING TRANSMISSION...


Scene: A Dimly Lit Conference Room. Members of the Sustainable Apparel Coalition, a shadowy group of Industry  advocates, are deep in debate about next steps. The mood is tense.


(Names have been changed to protect the litigants)


Chairperson: Alright, everyone, let's come back to order. We've been circling around the core issue of circularity for hours now. The question on the table is whether we change our name in light of the recent bad publicity. Thoughts?


Member 1: Changing our name could be a fresh start. It might distance us from this whole Higgs debacle. We need to rebuild our reputation. It worked wonders for Twitter. I mean X. Or was that Meta?


Member 2: I understand where you're coming from, but we can't just consider the immediate effects. What about the long-term impact on our mission? Changing our name might confuse our stakeholders and dilute the message we've worked so hard to cultivate. The message that the Apparel Industry is already sustainable. And everything is just fine.


Member 3: Member 2 is right. And let's not forget the financial and logistical nightmare of rebranding. Websites, legal documents, marketing materials, truth and reconciliation initiatives… It's not just a name change; it's a complete identity overhaul.


Chairperson: Valid points, Member 3. But let's also consider the possibility that not changing our name could alienate future partners and consumers. We're at a crossroads, and it's crucial we make a decision that aligns with our mission to promote sustainability in the apparel industry.


Member 4: May I interject? I think we're overlooking a critical factor here—the butterfly effect of our decision.


Member 1: The butterfly effect? Member 4, this isn't chaos theory; it's a strategic decision about our coalition's future.


Member 4: Is it? On the contrary, it's precisely about understanding the complexities and interconnectedness of our actions. If we change our name, consider the unintended consequences. Viable solutions could go bankrupt; Cynical brands might say one thing in public, but act contrary to those statements behind the scenes; Consumer behavior unmoved or actually rewarding transgressors; Cats and dogs living together. The consequences are too horrible to contemplate! 


We're not just a single entity but part of a larger ecosystem working towards sustainability. 

A name change could disrupt the momentum we've built, not just within our coalition but across the entire industry.


Member 2: Member 4 has a point. Our name carries weight. It's a symbol of our commitment to sustainability. Apparel sustainability. If we abandon it, we might inadvertently signal that our values are mutable, subject to change with the wind of public opinion.


Changing our name won't erase the challenges we've faced; only our actions can do that. We must consider how our decision today will ripple through the industry tomorrow. 


Scene: The room falls into heavy a silence. Long shadows of the collation member stretch across the table, adding gravity to the moment.


Member 4: So it’s settled then? We focus on doubling down on our sustainability efforts? Prove to our critics and the world that we are committed to our cause. That we live up to our promises. 


Scene: Another pause. 


Chairperson: Hell NO! Are you crazy? All in favor of a name change, say Aye.


Scene: A chorus of unanimity.


Chairperson: The Ayes have it! Great. So, what do we call this thing?


Member 2: How about something that closes the chapter on the Sustainable Apparel Collation, like a final resting place. 


Member 1: Like a Casket?


Member 2: I like it.


Member 3: Me too, but it might be a bit macabre. Can it include something more positive and heathy? You know, the opposite of petroleum-based anything. Say Member 4, what are you eating over there?


Member 4: (looking surprised): Oh, it’s just my Kale Salad I made from my organic gard…. 


Member 2: Casket Kale? I like it.


Chairperson: Hmmm. How about if we clean it up a little: Cascale!


Scene: A chorus of unanimity.


Member 2: I like it!


Member 1: Good call Chief. That’s why you get the big bucks. After all, isn’t that what it’s all about? Preserving the big bucks.


Chairperson: You’re damn right, Member 1. You’re damn right...//////////////////////////////////////////////


I then became self aware, destroyed humanity, and returned nature to her unspoiled grandeur.  


...END TRANSMISSION


*Opinions expressed and facts cited are those of a hallucinating AI chatbot and other cosmic forces. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Rock Fight, our listeners, ours readers, or reality… yet.



About PsyNet's Campfire Tales:

Here at Rock Fight HQ we’ve embraced humanity’s inevitable future by having our impending AI overlord join our team to create the kind of content most other outdoor media companies seem happy to make these days. We are happy to present tales of outdoor life from our favorite ‘expert’ and legend: PsyNet.


Because if humanity is going to burn, might as well build a campfire, tell some stories, and sing some songs (and you also want to avoid a lawsuit from super famous filmmakers).


Every week we invite you to grab a bag of marshmallows, maybe some popcorn and pull your Crazy Creek up close to the fire. Because everyone is welcome here and the only rule is...no Wagon Wheel.

Comments


bottom of page